I'm one of those people who get frustrated when others use your rather that you're or their instead of they're within the proper context.
It hurts my brain, and, of course, it is becoming as commonplace as seeing teenage boys wearing pants that hang halfway down their ass, revealing their underwear (that hurts my brain almost as much, BTW).
But I get a kick out of signs, and often snap a pic when I find one that hasn't been proof-read.
I've long been an advocate that writers, even top notch pro writers, always benefit from a good editor.
So I wonder, then, how signs like this, from a small Canadian pizza chain - and a fantastic one to boot -- (I cut the part of the sign that shows their name) could make it through such a professional production for multiple locations and nobody GUARANTEED that it was free of typos?
Or is this their way of pretending to guarantee something, but not really? (Would this be like promicing something -- because if you don't deliver, you're not really breaking a promise, merely a promice)
Granted, these hand-written signs can be forgiven (at least a bit). But they do make me shake my head.
Even this sign seems a little out of service.
Cheken breast? Is this evidence that the meat is over-processed? Or perhaps the sign isn't indicating a special price, but rather a special type of chicken . . .
But it's true, Virginia, even sign-makers need a good editor, or at least a solid proof-reader.
Mark Leslie is a writer, editor and bookseller who lives in Southern Ontario. In 2005, Mark joined the blogging bandwagon and started posting random thoughts and musings on writing, bookselling and being a father.
Showing posts with label observation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label observation. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Blocking Up The Scenery, Breaking My Mind
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
The Hot And Cold Of Misperception
It wasn't until the end of the day yesterday when I finally figured out the answer to a strange little mystery that had been nagging me.
I was curious as to why the faucets at the washroom I'd been using at U of Montreal were reversed, with cold (C) on the left and hot (H) on the right. I knew it wasn't a Quebec thing, because the faucets in my hotel room, which were colour coded (blue for cold and red for hot) were as expected. Hot on the left and cold on the right.
Also, by habit, I used the tap on the left (hot), and never clued in that the water running from it (marked C) was warm.
When I quickly glanced at the faucet on the right, I had abruptly interpreted the scripted letter there as some sort of fancy and strange "H" - but in fact, only noticed yesterday that it was an F.
C and F?
Then it struck me.
French.
C didn't stand for cold, it stood for the French word for hot, which is chaud. And that fancy script wasn't an "H", but an F, which meant froid.
It's funny how our mind makes quick and often incorrect assumptions that, although we are presented with concrete evidence that supports an alternative hypothesis (the water temperature, the F, the fact I was using a washroom in a predominantly French society), we ignore the facts and stick with that first assumption.
Sure, this is a simple thing regarding faucets in Quebec; but how many more other assumptions do we make each day which can have an adverse affect on the things we do and the people we communicate with?
I'm reminded of the importance to pause, step back, and take another look (attempt to take a fresh look) at something I thought I was looking at. And let the information presented to me try to get through rather than be filtered by the auto-editing that takes place in my perception.
A good thing to remember. A chaud little life lesson perhaps?
I was curious as to why the faucets at the washroom I'd been using at U of Montreal were reversed, with cold (C) on the left and hot (H) on the right. I knew it wasn't a Quebec thing, because the faucets in my hotel room, which were colour coded (blue for cold and red for hot) were as expected. Hot on the left and cold on the right.
Also, by habit, I used the tap on the left (hot), and never clued in that the water running from it (marked C) was warm.
When I quickly glanced at the faucet on the right, I had abruptly interpreted the scripted letter there as some sort of fancy and strange "H" - but in fact, only noticed yesterday that it was an F.
C and F?
Then it struck me.
French.
C didn't stand for cold, it stood for the French word for hot, which is chaud. And that fancy script wasn't an "H", but an F, which meant froid.
It's funny how our mind makes quick and often incorrect assumptions that, although we are presented with concrete evidence that supports an alternative hypothesis (the water temperature, the F, the fact I was using a washroom in a predominantly French society), we ignore the facts and stick with that first assumption.
Sure, this is a simple thing regarding faucets in Quebec; but how many more other assumptions do we make each day which can have an adverse affect on the things we do and the people we communicate with?
I'm reminded of the importance to pause, step back, and take another look (attempt to take a fresh look) at something I thought I was looking at. And let the information presented to me try to get through rather than be filtered by the auto-editing that takes place in my perception.
A good thing to remember. A chaud little life lesson perhaps?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

